The final meeting took place on a gray Wednesday morning in May 2013, exactly 24 hours after the ultimatum had been delivered.
The same sterile conference room that had witnessed months of systematic discrimination would now serve as the setting for the formal termination of Mateo's relationship with the club that had been his home for six transformative years.
The weather outside seemed to mirror the somber mood of the occasion, with low clouds hanging over Barcelona like a shroud. The Mediterranean, usually a brilliant blue, appeared gray and restless, as if nature itself was responding to the injustice about to unfold within the walls of the Camp Nou administrative complex.
Don Carlos had spent the intervening time consulting with legal advisors and exploring alternative options, but the conclusion was inevitable.
The contract terms offered by the club were so discriminatory and inadequate that accepting them would effectively end Mateo's development prospects, while the artificial timeline prevented any meaningful negotiation or exploration of compromise solutions.
The decision to reject the club's ultimatum had been made with heavy hearts but clear minds.
Mateo's future lay elsewhere, with institutions that would value his exceptional abilities rather than viewing his unique characteristics as commercial liabilities. The pain of leaving was profound, but the alternative was the slow death of his potential under discriminatory conditions.
"We have considered your offer carefully," Don Carlos announced as the meeting began, his voice steady despite the emotional weight of what was being communicated. "The terms presented do not reflect Mateo's sporting value or market position, and we cannot accept conditions that would compromise his development and future prospects."
The response was delivered with dignity and clarity, acknowledging the club's position while firmly rejecting discriminatory treatment that had no basis in sporting merit. The elderly man's experience with institutional advocacy had prepared him for this moment, but the emotional cost was evident in his measured tone.
Sandro Rosell's reaction was swift and revealed the extent to which the club's decision had been predetermined rather than dependent on Mateo's response to their ultimatum. His body language suggested satisfaction rather than disappointment, confirming that this outcome had been the institutional objective all along.
"We regret that you have chosen not to accept our offer," the president said, his tone suggesting disappointment rather than the satisfaction that his body language clearly conveyed. "Given this decision, we have no alternative but to terminate your contract and request that you vacate club facilities within 48 hours."
The statement was delivered with clinical efficiency, reducing years of exceptional development and achievement to a simple administrative decision. The language was carefully chosen to suggest that Mateo's departure was the result of his own choices rather than institutional discrimination.
María Fernández, the legal counsel, provided the formal documentation that would govern the termination process. The papers were comprehensive and detailed, designed to protect the club's interests while providing minimal consideration for the human cost of their decisions.
"The termination is effective immediately," she announced, her tone reflecting the professional detachment that had characterized the club's approach throughout the systematic campaign. "All club property must be returned, and access to facilities will be revoked as of this afternoon."
The efficiency of the termination process revealed the extent of the planning that had preceded this moment. The club had prepared for Mateo's departure long before the ultimatum was delivered, with administrative procedures already in place to facilitate his immediate removal from the organization.
The documents that María Fernández presented included detailed inventories of club property that needed to be returned, access codes that would be deactivated, and legal waivers that would prevent future claims against the institution.
The thoroughness of the preparation demonstrated how completely the club had anticipated and planned for this outcome.
The most devastating aspect of the termination was the impact on Mateo's living situation at La Masia, which had been his home for six years. The dormitory that had provided stability and community throughout his development would no longer be available, forcing him to leave not just his football career but also his daily environment and support network.
"Accommodation at La Masia is reserved for active players within our system," Josep Segura explained, his tone suggesting that this was a reasonable administrative requirement rather than a deliberate attempt to maximize the disruption to Mateo's life. "Alternative arrangements must be made immediately."
The statement was delivered without acknowledgment of the emotional and practical challenges that such displacement would create. The club was essentially making Mateo homeless as part of their systematic effort to force his departure and discourage any attempt to remain in the area.
Andoni Zubizarreta, who had remained silent throughout most of the proceedings and absent in the last, finally spoke to express his personal regret about the situation while acknowledging his powerlessness to influence the institutional decision. His words carried the weight of professional frustration and personal disappointment.
"I want to express my personal appreciation for your contributions to our organization," he said, his voice carrying the frustration and conflict that had characterized his position throughout the systematic campaign. "Your sporting achievements have been exceptional, and I regret that circumstances have led to this outcome."
The sporting director's statement was significant because it represented the first acknowledgment from any club official that Mateo's departure was not based on sporting considerations. The admission was carefully worded to avoid direct criticism of institutional decisions, but the implications were clear.
"From a football perspective, this is a mistake that we will regret," Zubizarreta continued, his professional integrity finally overriding institutional loyalty. "But I understand that other factors have influenced this decision, and I lack the authority to change the outcome."
The administrative details that followed were handled with the same clinical efficiency that had characterized the entire termination process. Equipment return procedures, facility access revocation, and documentation requirements were explained with professional detachment that ignored the human cost of these decisions.
The inventory of items to be returned was extensive and detailed, including training gear, medical equipment, educational materials, and personal items that had accumulated over six years of residence at La Masia. The systematic nature of the list demonstrated how thoroughly the club had prepared for this moment.
The most heartbreaking aspect of the termination was the impact on Mateo's relationships with teammates and coaches who had become his extended family over six years of shared development and achievement.
The systematic campaign had already created distance in many of these relationships, but the formal termination would sever connections that had been central to his daily life.
Luis Enrique, who had been instrumental in Mateo's development with the reserve team, was not present for the termination meeting but had requested permission to say goodbye privately.
The coach's absence from the formal proceedings reflected his unwillingness to participate in a process that contradicted everything he believed about football development and human dignity.
The System provided a final analysis of the termination and its implications for Mateo's future, its clinical assessment offering clarity amid the emotional turmoil of institutional betrayal.
Institutional termination process confirms systematic discrimination based on commercial rather than sporting considerations, the entity observed. The efficiency and planning evident in these procedures indicate that your departure was predetermined regardless of your response to their ultimatum.
However, the termination also represents liberation from an environment that had become hostile to your development.
Alternative pathways exist that will provide opportunities for continued growth and achievement without the constraints of discriminatory institutional policies.
Analysis of European football market indicates significant interest from clubs that prioritize sporting merit over commercial calculation.
Your exceptional abilities and achievements will be valued appropriately in environments that maintain traditional football values.
The analysis was both sobering and encouraging, acknowledging the pain of the current situation while recognizing that departure from a discriminatory environment could ultimately prove beneficial for Mateo's long-term development and well-being.
The meeting concluded with the formal signing of termination documents that would end Mateo's official relationship with the club. The papers were comprehensive and detailed, designed to protect the institution's interests while providing minimal consideration for the human cost of their decisions.
As the participants prepared to leave the conference room, the transformation in institutional attitude was complete and undeniable. The warmth and encouragement that had characterized previous interactions had been replaced by cold efficiency and professional detachment that reduced years of exceptional achievement to administrative inconvenience.